mace-opensaml-users - Re: Session timeout at IdP | SAML 1.1
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: "" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Session timeout at IdP | SAML 1.1
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:56:15 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lStX6TVqJXwdEs2MRLUYtoPAUHZ/Jj7ZI/5wy96bEhtJ1vsKrSqGkgdYP57vu8jgn3+hiedjRBtejy/pryV0pWsBYLbX3A1XmpkBBrZCMXQ8c06BriezqddeQ82c//HYYJszw/LzZRXRn0T8uEdmYVGTO2uPQPUU44xnuE6Pi3M=
On 2/1/06,
<>
wrote:
>
> We are planning to work on a opensaml 1.1 implementation for SSO,
> implementing the browser artifact profile.
Why don't you just use Shibboleth instead of reinventing the wheel?
> I was wondering as to how does SAML handle (if at all it handles) Session
> timeout at the IdP, while the user is working at SP.
I don't believe it does. This is an implementation issue. So if you
really want to roll your own browser profile, you should probably look
at Shibboleth for implementation details.
Cheers,
Tom
- Session timeout at IdP | SAML 1.1, narayan . rajesh, 02/01/2006
- Re: Session timeout at IdP | SAML 1.1, Tom Scavo, 02/01/2006
- Re: Session timeout at IdP | SAML 1.1, Chad La Joie, 02/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.