Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: Problem in getting back the assertion

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: Problem in getting back the assertion


Chronological Thread 
  • From: anshuk pal chaudhuri <>
  • To:
  • Cc: Scott Cantor <>
  • Subject: RE: Problem in getting back the assertion
  • Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:07:38 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Xm/VBhbh6DxQeJ4KNkrqnzqfP+UJ9a+bqIYVK40eBC6hUI7qWyHL/aumfw6sSDRQC4fWQ10YxHW29qbEpCFrtIJSwqziEUl31xVdXgr1IQCkQ1y7ZSuL1134LpksnSq2/X4Y+VUCSpPxL2AwS9khVeL0BDMPPiuW2ViKZVaAfA4= ;
Scott,

I have given the assertion.
I think the assertion is fine.

The point you made about the toggling on the
strict-dom-checking config property,how do I do that?
The opensaml assertion when created is checking from
the endorsed lib of jdk comprising of:
dom3-xml-apis-2.4.0.jar
dom3-xercesImpl-2.4.0.jar

What exact configuration do i need to make?


Regards,
Anshuk
--- Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:

> > Is the assertion created ok?Or do I need to put
> > anything extra?
>
> The last time somebody got an error like that, the
> element they were passing
> into the constructor wasn't the SAML Assertion
> element, but something else.
> If you toggle on the strict-dom-checking config
> property, the code will
> actually detect that explicitly.
>
> By default, it assumes you sort of know what you're
> doing and doesn't check
> the root element for you.
>
> -- Scott
>
>





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page