mace-opensaml-users - RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: ,
- Subject: RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 19:01:29 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> On a related note, why are the base64 functions based on byte
> [] on the encoded side ? wouldn't they be more useful if they
> returned / accepted a string ?
It's been both at various times, and is mostly driven by the base64
implementation I happened to be using. I'm not sure I see much distinction
in the functionality, but then I'm not much of a Java programmer either. Is
there a reason to assume only String is useful and force the conversion?
-- Scott
- Base64 encoding exception, Richard Gundersen, 05/03/2004
- RE: Base64 encoding exception, Scott Cantor, 05/03/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: RE: Base64 encoding exception, sfell, 05/03/2004
- RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception, Scott Cantor, 05/03/2004
- RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception, Mark Wilcox, 05/03/2004
- RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception, Scott Cantor, 05/03/2004
- RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception, Konstantin Shmakov, 05/03/2004
- RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception, Richard Gundersen, 05/04/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.