Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Scott Cantor <>
  • To: ,
  • Subject: RE: RE: Base64 encoding exception
  • Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 19:01:29 -0400
  • Organization: The Ohio State University

> On a related note, why are the base64 functions based on byte
> [] on the encoded side ? wouldn't they be more useful if they
> returned / accepted a string ?

It's been both at various times, and is mostly driven by the base64
implementation I happened to be using. I'm not sure I see much distinction
in the functionality, but then I'm not much of a Java programmer either. Is
there a reason to assume only String is useful and force the conversion?

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page