mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAMLSubject Question
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: ,
- Subject: RE: SAMLSubject Question
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:42:07 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Is there a particular reason why you did not create
> NameIdentifier and SubjectConfirmation as seperate classes
> during the design of the SAMLSubject class.
Initially because I didn't need them. Java now has a separate NameIdentifier
class. I doubt I'll ever go back and mess with subject confirmation in 1.x,
but I'd factor it out if I do 2.x.
You're welcome to do the work and sign the I2 contributors agreement. ;-)
-- Scott
- SAMLSubject Question, arathod4, 04/08/2004
- RE: SAMLSubject Question, Scott Cantor, 04/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.