OpenSAML user discussion

[Scott Cantor <>]

> When I use one SAMLSubject instance to create multiple SAML statements,
> the subject appears only in the last statement. And thus it fails the
> SAMLSubject.checkValidity for the first statement.
> 
> Is it a bug or supposed to work in that way?

All SAML objects passed into a constructor or setter method take ownership
of it. You must clone it first if you want to keep ownership of a copy. The
alternative is giving control over copying to the library, and while that
may be acceptable in Java, I'm not willing to pay that performance penalty
in C++.

-- Scott