OpenSAML user discussion

[Scott Cantor <>]

> I get well-formed XML when I call the "toString()" method of 
> SAMLResponse, but I do not see the "samlp" in the element 
> namespace (e.g. "<samlp:Response>"). Instead I see 
> "<Response>". I haven't yet attempted to digitally sign the 
> reponse, so I wonder if the "samlp" occurs during canonicalization.

I generally declare a default namespace (for better or for worse) and 
override it when necessary. As far as I know, what's in cvs
generates valid XML in all the cases I know of, both Java and C++. The Java 
serializes to exclusive c14n in every case, and there's
an Init class method to get/set the inclusive prefix list.

As long as the prefix list is correct, it shouldn't matter what the XML is 
contained in when it serializes, the output should be
consistent.

-- Scott

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

    http://archives.internet2.edu/

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users--