grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Hyzer, Chris" <>
- To: "Black, Carey M." <>, Siju Jacob <>, " Mailing List" <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:34:53 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=isc.upenn.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=isc.upenn.edu; dkim=pass header.d=isc.upenn.edu; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PFv0Bp1751QD1jUpDaG6MzVHr/5UyhuchpQyjE8N7PA=; b=fKgu+6Tb1Kl0UibHM/q3apQOLUGOMs/od5FcnJe0aHvuvcRliNcOUfnpiS7StlbqKV7IdJMsT+0jGa79X1M3xv+tCL+IAtjsTKCLbiGTtmjSysMEzkkxLjgSjcK4Sg0OICwfutw2rUfPmyyajaNuxH3Lz7NH7cKYjO4Qe4Lj862EXU2+hO499qMp5+QeDWZRM6wTESMPpmCFfygFvIFsHmpyCfIMACwlWZbqmGbjZMZXFyqxA/TZJ5EXoZNmmaUhYsAoeunOtXF3knFv2KezPnOrfF3G3YgIkdlnc6MPgzoKoq6rZgKNvqBbTBTtQrkWYvN30ItjopvZW5K7afprEQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gH4D7YcqOBo1eDaz0AKbYvQ+65p2iajsOsWFUaryv0lzK5qLBMBJqhJgiDe/tSswtzyjH6m6X5UIDk8Ak/HBtlr89AwxxGSjpXXOaBZ37Mh46iu99T8+ZWJyA2u135fdH//JR09PRDpd0DHiKCC45TVSV9FsGL7oV8QjMdNWl83UHYD0Q2iBe58RfNeTVhbfiPO7nCiDLpQTEJQQb6BVzenRGEqrQ5BgeB6HnQwg+Jt4BOQ5t22Jqm0EMHDzAtMRtWvzrYO0ZB3EjLdDs4pVqWjMiH524x3YIhwRBRAtf6z1V5bfgVrG2c7MKRk1jQgL1ThDZ+HHt4HGDBTR/aGOsg==
You can log requests and responses:
Can you send us the output in 2.3 and 2.4? 😊 do you still have a 2.3 env? Are you sure the privileges are ok for the caller? Does the call work with grouper client?
You can call the 2.3 service in 2.4, though it uses the same underlying logic as 2.4. Does it make a difference?
Can you reproduce this in a test env?
I don’t think you should run 2.3 web service against a 2.4 registry… lets try to figure out the issue
Thanks Chris
From: <>
On Behalf Of Black, Carey M.
Siju,
I have not tracked down the code that produces the output string you are reporting. However I find it “odd” that there is a “,\n” at the end of the groupName value. Maybe that is being added in that error message… but maybe not….
Is it possible that you are actually passing a string to the Web Service that ends in “a comma and a hard return” as part of the group name?
-- Carey Matthew
From: <>
On Behalf Of Siju Jacob
Hi Team, We are having issues with grouper webservice 2.4. With grouper ws 2.4 we get the below response using restclient.
{"WsGetMembersResults":{"resultMetadata":{"success":"F","resultCode":"PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS","resultMessage":"There were 0 successes and 1 failures of getting members for groups."},"subjectAttributeNames":["loginid","name"],"responseMetadata":{"serverVersion":"2.4.0","millis":"1248"},"results":[{"resultMetadata":{"success":"F","resultCode":"GROUP_NOT_FOUND","resultMessage":"Invalid group for 'wsGroupLookup', WsGroupLookup[pitGroups=[],groupName=apps:oit:eas:idm:Open_Registry:RBHS-Services-Requesters,\n groupFindResult=GROUP_NOT_FOUND], WsGroupLookup[pitGroups=[],groupName=apps:oit:eas:idm:Open_Registry:RBHS-Services-Requesters,\n groupFindResult=GROUP_NOT_FOUND], null"}}]}}
Whereas it works fine with grouper ws 2.3.
My question here is can we have grouper ui 2.4 running with grouper ws 2.3.
Thanks, Siju Jacob |
- [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4, Siju Jacob, 08/07/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4, Black, Carey M., 08/09/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4, Hyzer, Chris, 08/09/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4, Siju Jacob, 08/09/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4, Hyzer, Chris, 08/09/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] PROBLEM_GETTING_MEMBERS grouper ws 2.4, Black, Carey M., 08/09/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.