Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

["Hyzer, Chris" <>]

The “type” requireInGroup was meant to be lightweight, but you can make more composites to do this I think.  We have had discussions to make the “composite”  concept in Grouper to be more powerful, and we have a long term plan for this.

 

I made this wiki:

 

https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+UI+composites

 

Does that address the issue?

 

Thanks

Chris

 

From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Farmer, Jacob
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 9:51 AM
To: Bickel, David <>;
Subject: [grouper-users] RE: IncludeExclude and requiredGroups

 

Colleagues,

 

Anyone have an insight on how we might troubleshoot this?

 

Thanks!

Jacob

 

From: [] On Behalf Of Bickel, David
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:11 PM
To:
Subject: [grouper-users] IncludeExclude and requiredGroups

 

Hello fellow grouper users,

 

I have been tasked with figuring out the functionality of how to have grouper build groups that are a composite of more than 2 groups.  I am able to use the basic composite group logic to perform intersect operations.   However, when I attempt to use groups set as grouperIncludeExclude requireGroup types I seem to not be able to achieve similar behavior.

 

From the documentation,  I have created a group called “GroupA”.  If that group is then flagged with attribute to requireEmployee and requireHasEmail, the group should be populated from the intersect of those groups.

 

Does anyone see any glaring oversight here?  I appreciate any guidance from those more experienced in the ways of Grouper.

 

Thanks,

--David

 

J. David Bickel

Identity Management Systems

Indiana University

812-855-6346