Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - [grouper-users] IncludeExclude and requiredGroups

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

[grouper-users] IncludeExclude and requiredGroups


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Bickel, David" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [grouper-users] IncludeExclude and requiredGroups
  • Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:11:24 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Hello fellow grouper users,

 

I have been tasked with figuring out the functionality of how to have grouper build groups that are a composite of more than 2 groups.  I am able to use the basic composite group logic to perform intersect operations.   However, when I attempt to use groups set as grouperIncludeExclude requireGroup types I seem to not be able to achieve similar behavior.

 

From the documentation,  I have created a group called “GroupA”.  If that group is then flagged with attribute to requireEmployee and requireHasEmail, the group should be populated from the intersect of those groups.

 

Does anyone see any glaring oversight here?  I appreciate any guidance from those more experienced in the ways of Grouper.

 

Thanks,

--David

 

J. David Bickel

Identity Management Systems

Indiana University

812-855-6346

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



  • [grouper-users] IncludeExclude and requiredGroups, Bickel, David, 05/31/2017

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page