grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: "William G. Thompson, Jr." <>
- To: Julio Polo <>
- Cc: "Farmer, Jacob" <>, "Hyzer, Chris" <>, "" <>, "Waldbieser, Carl" <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 17:26:20 -0400
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Lafayette is also interested in native rabbitmq support. At present
we're running a custom change log consumer that pushes to rabbitmq.
Would be great to switch to a standard component for that.
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Julio Polo
<>
wrote:
> We commissioned the work, but have not had a chance to try it yet. We do
> use RabbitMQ extensively. Hence, our interest in getting Grouper to publish
> messages to it.
>
> -julio
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Farmer, Jacob
> <>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Julio. Definitely worth a look.
>>
>>
>>
>> Are you running this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacob
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Julio Polo
>> [mailto:]
>> Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 3:17 PM
>> To: Hyzer, Chris
>> <>
>> Cc: Farmer, Jacob
>> <>;
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate
>> approach?
>>
>>
>>
>> There's also this for RabbitMQ:
>>
>> https://github.com/Unicon/grouper-amqp-esb-publisher
>>
>> -julio
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Hyzer, Chris
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> There is built in grouper messaging. You can configure a change log
>> consumer (already exists, no need to write code), to filter on that group
>> name and send a grouper message. The thing that needs to be notified can
>> change grouper messaging.
>>
>>
>>
>> We could use better docs for this, and I can improve them if you like, but
>> heres the current link
>>
>>
>>
>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+Messaging+System
>>
>>
>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+messaging+send+receive+example
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you do messaging at Indiana with AWS, activeMQ, rabbitMQ, azure, etc?
>> We don’t have adapters for those yet, but if we had one (shouldn’t be hard
>> and we actually are starting to work on them now), we could configure the
>> above connector to just send messages to your message queue system instead
>> of the built in grouper one.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Grouper ESB can send messages out as well, though your system would
>> need to implement a certain HTTP spec or you could do XMPP, though the
>> messaging I think would be preferable…
>>
>>
>>
>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+ESB+Connector
>>
>>
>>
>> If you don’t want to do either of these, then yes, writing a change log
>> consumer would be ideal. I would use a helper class though, e.g. extend
>> ChangeLogConsumerImpl, and you can mark your class(es) to listen for with
>> an
>> attribute, even if you only have one.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=14517905
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>>
>> [mailto:]
>> On Behalf Of Farmer, Jacob
>> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 1:51 PM
>> To:
>>
>> Subject: [grouper-users] Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?
>>
>>
>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>>
>>
>> We have been presented with a business need and I’m not sure the best way
>> to resolve it. I would appreciate it if you would be willing to help me
>> brainstorm/consider alternate approaches. I will add that we are new to
>> Grouper and so apologies in advance if this is a trivial problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> We have primarily been working with Grouper to manage LDAP groups in our
>> Active Directory. As we start to consider expanded use cases, we have an
>> application that needs to be notified when a calculated group’s membership
>> changes. Reviewing the docs, there seems to be at least two options:
>> writing
>> a custom grouper hook and creating a worker process that monitors the
>> changelog. We also have a third option in this case: write a separate
>> process that triggers on an update to the LDAP group membership.
>>
>>
>>
>> For those of you who are more experienced -- do any of these jump out as
>> the “right answer”? I’m tempted to write a process to watch the change log
>> because it seems architecturally easiest, but I would appreciate learning
>> from this group’s collective experience.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacob
>>
>>
>>
>> =========================
>>
>> Jacob Farmer
>>
>> Identity Management Systems
>>
>> (812) 856-0186
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
- [grouper-users] Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Farmer, Jacob, 05/01/2017
- [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Hyzer, Chris, 05/01/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Julio Polo, 05/01/2017
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Farmer, Jacob, 05/01/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Julio Polo, 05/01/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, William G. Thompson, Jr., 05/01/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Julio Polo, 05/01/2017
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Farmer, Jacob, 05/01/2017
- [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Farmer, Jacob, 05/01/2017
- [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Hyzer, Chris, 05/02/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Julio Polo, 05/01/2017
- [grouper-users] RE: Grouper hooks and a possible alternate approach?, Hyzer, Chris, 05/01/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.