Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] Grouper 2.2.2 issues when recreating groups and adding as members via WS

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

RE: [grouper-users] Grouper 2.2.2 issues when recreating groups and adding as members via WS


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Hyzer, Chris" <>
  • To: Phil Pishioneri <>, Robert Bradley <>, "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [grouper-users] Grouper 2.2.2 issues when recreating groups and adding as members via WS
  • Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:25:02 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:Gfu8NxyQLTCXs6bXCy+O+j09IxM/srCxBDY+r6Qd0OoWIJqq85mqBkHD//Il1AaPBtqLra8fwLOL+4nbGkU+or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6aijSI4DUTAhTyMxZubqSwQ9aKzpf/6+fnw53SZ01whSG9YLR0IQ+35VHJudE+mZB/bKs9102N6kFPcelM2StCP1ufmxvtrpOq+5Ru6TgWsego+8pNQI37Y+I/XfpRB3I7MDZxrIfkrx7eVQaVo3cRTE0XlAZFGQ7I8Eu8U5vs+GOuufB6xTGXJ4jrVr0uQhyj6btmUhnllH1BOjIkpjL5kMt12eh7sQCsvVg36I7OYZrffK57daPMb94AbWtaVYBMTyFHBMWxY5ZZXLlJBvpRs4So/whGlhC5HwT5Qbq3kjI=
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

I think its artificial enough, though if someone really wants to get this to
work I can tell you how to configure ehcache to not cache very long. I think
there are more disadvantages to this so people might not want to do this...


Thanks
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Pishioneri
[mailto:]

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:51 PM
To: Hyzer, Chris
<>;
Robert Bradley
<>;



<>
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Grouper 2.2.2 issues when recreating groups and
adding as members via WS

On 8/17/16 10:54 AM, Hyzer, Chris wrote:
> ... If you > are churning through adding and deleting groups then the
> caches will
> get confused. ...


If that is accurate, does statement 3a

3. Multiple WS and UI app servers/web servers can be load balanced for
HA and high loads
1. The WS is stateless, any load balancing is fine
2. The UI is stateful (only for CSRF guard), and needs sticky load
balancing. If a node fails the user will need to start over on
another node (unless sessions are clustered across app servers)


from

https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+high+availability


need tweaked (also require sticky load balancing), or was the test
artificial enough to not worry about it?

-Phil




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page