grouper-users - [grouper-users] RE: change_log_entry_temp vs change_log_entry
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Chris Hyzer <>
- To: "Kediyal, Prashant" <>, "" <>
- Subject: [grouper-users] RE: change_log_entry_temp vs change_log_entry
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:21:21 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Btw, the purpose is to order and assign a sequential increasing number to each event… (since they are occurring in various transactions and connections and
processes and we aren’t relying on database vendor specific sequences. Thanks, Chris From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Kediyal, Prashant Hi, We have been having a few cases where we see valid web service requests that get logged in the web services log but don’t get provisioned through our change log
consumer code. When we look at the change log entry table we don’t see the record corresponding to the one logged in the web service log but we see it in change_log_entry_temp.
I am assuming That only the records in change_log_entry result in an invocation of our change log consumer. Question is what is the use of the change_log_entry_temp
and if it is a temporary holding table, then when will the record move to change_log_entry so that our change log consumer receives it and then proceeds to provision to our LDAP. Any suggestions? —Prashant |
- [grouper-users] change_log_entry_temp vs change_log_entry, Kediyal, Prashant, 02/13/2015
- [grouper-users] RE: change_log_entry_temp vs change_log_entry, Chris Hyzer, 02/13/2015
- Re: [grouper-users] change_log_entry_temp vs change_log_entry, Andrew Morgan, 02/13/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.