Grouper Developers Forum

[Tom Zeller <>]

Talk about quick turnaround :-)

Thanks, I think that makes it easier for folks.

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Shilen Patel 
<>
 wrote:
> I updated the wiki and removed those actions in the 2.0 branch.  The
> actions for the old attribute framework aren't used either so I removed
> those as well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Shilen
>
>
> On 11/9/11 8:47 AM, "Tom Zeller" 
> <>
>  wrote:
>
>>I guess my question is, why do we have these change log types if they
>>will never appear in the change log ?
>>
>>Someone implementing a change log consumer who reads the code or the
>>wiki might think they could trigger actions based on these change log
>>types, but they never occur, which could be considered confusing or
>>unexpected.
>>
>>TomZ
>>
>>https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Notifications+(change+log)
>>
>>On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Shilen Patel 
>><>
>> wrote:
>>> Right, the change log contains the individual low level changes (group
>>> creates, renames, etc).  If you need these, I can add them.  Or if
>>>you're
>>> looking for the high level change, you may be able to get that from the
>>> user audit by querying the context id like you're doing with group
>>>deletes.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -- Shilen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/8/11 9:33 PM, "Tom Zeller" 
>>> <>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>It looks like the STEM_MOVE, STEM_COPY, GROUP_MOVE, and GROUP_COPY
>>>>ChangeLogTypeBuiltin enums are never used, while the corresponding
>>>>audit entries are. Do we need these change log types ?
>>>>
>>>>TomZ
>>>
>>>
>
>