Grouper Developers Forum

[Kathryn Huxtable <>]

Well, I can fix the exporting problem. Thanks. I probably have it  
exported in my .profile.

As for the data removal, yes, it relates to scoping and unfortunately  
there's no workaround until we get a mechanism in place.

Yes, you *could* export all your externally provisioned groups and  
feed them into grouper, but that seems like overkill. If you're  
currently provisioning your isMemberOf attributes from some other  
source, then I'd use a test LDAP directory until we have scoping  
working.

Not sure why it didn't provision your test group, though. Could you  
send me your (password-sanitized) ldappc.xml file please?

-K

On Aug 11, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Graham Seaman wrote:

> Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
> > Graham Seaman pointed out that there was a problem in my runner  
> > scripts. I've fixed them.
> >
> > I've deployed a new snapshot, ldappc-1.2.0 snapshot  
> > 20080811.152437-2, to the I2 site. It's linked on the wiki download  
> > page.
> That now runs (though CLASSPATH needs explicitly exporting, at least  
> on my box. Otherwise I get the dreaded:
>
> [16:58 g_seaman@vaheva:/usr/local/src/ldappc-1.2.0-SNAPSHOT] ./bin/ 
> ldappc.sh -subject GrouperSystem -memberships -subject GrouperSystem
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: edu/ 
> internet2/middleware/ldappc/Ldappc)
>
> Unfortunately my first attempt at a run  with
> ./bin/ldappc.sh -subject GrouperSystem -memberships
>
> simply removed all isMemberOf attributes from all my existing ldap  
> data and didn't provision my little grouper test group at all. The  
> data removal
> presumably relates to the thread 'Proposal for ldappc provision  
> scoping behavior', but until that is settled, what is the best fix?  
> I assume I need to make sure all my externally provisioned groups  
> are fed into grouper; do I need to do that through exporting xml  
> from ldap and importing it to grouper, or is there a better way (the  
> externally provisioned groups are updated on a daily basis)?
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
> Graham
> > Sorry about that. I'd swear those scripts worked a few weeks ago...
> >
> > -K