Grouper Developers Forum

[Kathryn Huxtable <>]

Okay, I have a very preliminary version of ldappc, which I have renamed to
rdbpc. It provisions tables in an RDBMS. I can run through a provisioning
cycle with nothing to do in about 30 seconds.

I am no longer interested in provisioning LDAP from Grouper and Signet. I'll
provision my Oracle tables and then provision LDAP from there using my
current provisioning software.

When I have this in such shape that I'm willing to run it in production,
I'll release it to I2. I have used the edu.internet2.middleware.rdbpc
package name. I can change this if that's desired.

-K


On 1/30/07 9:12 AM, "Kathryn Huxtable" 
<>
 wrote:

> Yes. The objectClass attribute is indexed by default, and I indexed
> eduPersonPrincipalName, which is what I'm using for a subject search. My RDN
> is my person registry key, and it doesn't seem to matter whether I use it or
> the EPPN as a subject search. Both are indexed.
> 
> -K
> 
> 
> On 1/30/07 8:53 AM, "Jeff Van Eeuwen" 
> <>
>  wrote:
> 
>> Kathryn
>> 
>> Since the time is spent looking for subject DNs, are there indexes defined
>> for
>> the attributes used in the filter defined in the source-subject-identifier
>> section of the configuration file?  (I assume there are given that 
>> isMemberOf
>> is indexed) 
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>> 
>>> Oh, and yes, isMemberOf is indexed in my SunJava 5.2 directory server. -K
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1/29/07 2:01 PM, "Tom Barton" 
>>> <>
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> <I'm CCing just the grouper-dev list, to pick just one place for
>>>> continuing this thread.>
>>>> 
>>>> Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
>>>>> Okay, I see that the problem is that it takes over 15 minutes to search
>>> the
>>>>> existing subject DNs in my LDAP directory.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you refer to (1) grouper API's use of the subject API to render
>>>> membership lists to present to ldappc, or (2) ldappc looking up DNs of
>>>> subjects in LDAP in order to review and update their memberships?
>>>> 
>>>> About how many subjects, groups, and memberships are referenced in the
>>>> groups selected for provisioning?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tom
>>> 
>