grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter
Subject: Grouper Developers Forum
List archive
- From: Dave Donnelly <>
- To: Tom Barton <>
- Cc: Grouper Dev <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:13:12 -0800
Ah, but the fly in my ointment is Signet's requirement for
multiple attribute values. For instance, we have a Person
with two login IDs: Jean Poole as 'jpoole' and 'demo'. The
query, as you specified, will return two records (see
Example, below. The actual contents of tables 'subject' and
'subjectattribute' appear below the Example).
Returning two records causes JDBCSourceAdapter to throw a
SubjectNotUniqueException. Again, I would need to subclass
JDBCSourceAdapter to override method createUniqueSubject(),
or write my own class from scratch (duplicating 85% of the
existing code), to handle the situation.
The changes I made try to uphold the notion of a unique Subject
while still permitting multiple attribute values. Of the 3 public
methods provided by JDBCSourceAdapter, getSubject() and
getSubjectByIdentifier() both constrain the results to a single
record (throwing exceptions otherwise). My only other option
would then be to always call search() and write a bunch of _application_
code (not SubjectAPI code) to sift through the results and
correctly build Subjects with multiple attribute values.
Granted, my solution within Signet is not elegant. I must
issue two queries - one for the matching Subject, another for
it's attributes. But, by extending JDBCSourceAdapter and only
overriding one method - loadAttributes(ResultSet) - I try to
maintain an object-oriented approach and keep SubjectAPI
details within a clearly defined Signet-extension-of-SubjectAPI
boundary.
Example:
select
subject.subjectid as id, subject.name as name,
lfnamet.lfname as lfname, loginidt.loginid as loginid,
desct.description as description
from
subject
left join (select subjectid, value as lfname from subjectattribute
where name='name') as lfnamet
on subject.subjectid=lfnamet.subjectid
left join (select subjectid, value as loginid from subjectattribute
where name='loginid') as loginidt
on subject.subjectid=loginidt.subjectid
left join (select subjectid, value as description from subjectattribute
where name='description') as desct
on subject.subjectid=desct.subjectid
where
(lower(name) like '%poo%')
or (lower(lfnamet.lfname) like '%poo%')
or (lower(loginidt.loginid) like '%poo%')
or (lower(desct.description) like '%poo%')
id name lfname loginid description ------- ----------- ----------- ---------- -------------------------------------
SD00007 Poole, Jean Poole, Jean demo Principal Investigator, Bio-X project
SD00007 Poole, Jean Poole, Jean jpoole Principal Investigator, Bio-X project
2 record(s) selected [Fetch MetaData: 31/ms] [Fetch Data: 0/ms]
select * from subject where subjectid = 'SD00007'
subjecttypeid subjectid name description displayid modifydatetime ---------------- ------------ ----------- -------------- ------------ ----------------------
person SD00007 Poole, Jean n/a n/a 11/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
1 record(s) selected [Fetch MetaData: 16/ms] [Fetch Data: 0/ms]
[Executed: 11/21/06 3:45:59 PM PST ] [Execution: 0/ms]
>[SQL] Script lines: 2-2 ----------------------------
select * from subjectattribute where subjectid = 'SD00007'
subjecttypeid subjectid name instance value searchvalue modifydatetime ---------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ----------------------
person SD00007 all 1 all all 11/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
person SD00007 description 1 Principal Investigator, Bio-X project principal investigator, bio-x project 11/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
person SD00007 loginid 2 demo demo 11/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
person SD00007 loginid 1 jpoole jpoole 11/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
person SD00007 name 1 Poole, Jean poole jean 11/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
5 record(s) selected [Fetch MetaData: 0/ms] [Fetch Data: 0/ms]
Tom Barton wrote:
Dave Donnelly wrote:
Signet uses a "database-within-a-database" to act as a
subject provider. One of the Signet utilities, SubjectFileLoader,
reads a flatfile and loads subject information into two tables
(subject and subjectattribute). These tables are then accessed
by a JDBCSourceAdapter to provide new Subjects whenever Signet
is creating proxies and/or assignments.
Neither of these tables are "official" Signet tables, but are,
I believe, legacy from a reference implementation of SubjectAPI
providing Subjects to Signet. I couldn't determine how to rewrite
SubjectFileLoader to conform to the new way SubjectAPI retrieves
Subjects because of the (new?) requirement for a single attribute
possibly having multiple values. Instead, I made the current JDBC
classes extend-able, sub-classed it, and overrode the methods that
affect Signet. The subclass (SignetJDBCSourceAdapter) is contained
in the Signet project and does not affect the Subject project.
I guess your work is done. But the the 0.2.1 JDBCSourceAdapter reads Minh's database schema just fine, so I wonder if there was any need at all. Oh well.
Just for the record, here's the essential SQL that figures in sources.xml for that particular subject source. The where clause changes for each subject search/selection method, but the rest is the same.
select
subject.subjectid as id, subject.name as name,
lfnamet.lfname as lfname, loginidt.loginid as loginid,
desct.description as description
from
subject
left join (select subjectid, value as lfname from subjectattribute
where name='name') as lfnamet
on subject.subjectid=lfnamet.subjectid
left join (select subjectid, value as loginid from subjectattribute
where name='loginid') as loginidt
on subject.subjectid=loginidt.subjectid
left join (select subjectid, value as description from subjectattribute
where name='description') as desct
on subject.subjectid=desct.subjectid
where
(lower(name) like '%%TERM%%')
or (lower(lfnamet.lfname) like '%%TERM%%')
or (lower(loginidt.loginid) like '%%TERM%%')
or (lower(desct.description) like '%%TERM%%')
- [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Dave Donnelly, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Tom Barton, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Dave Donnelly, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Tom Barton, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Dave Donnelly, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Tom Barton, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Dave Donnelly, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Tom Barton, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Dave Donnelly, 11/21/2006
- Re: [grouper-dev] Minor changes to JDBC Adapter, Tom Barton, 11/21/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.