dynes-deployments - Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES
Subject: DYNES-Deployments
List archive
- From: "Jorge L. Rodriguez" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:00:06 -0400
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Hi Shawn Thanks for the quick response. I am not sure what range of VLANs I allow DYNES to use. As far as I know this was not something I had anything to do with personally. VLAN 704 is not one I am familiar with and in fact wasn't on any of my ports a couple of months ago. I do know that somethings were changing with the switch configuration as of a few weeks back. For example, the last time I logged into the FDT server I couldn't connect to the WAN because something upstream had changed the 6248's configuration that I manually set. I left it like that because James at FIU was working on something. Just today I hopped back on the systems and low and behold things were working again. Apparently whatever broke my connectivity restored it. But as I mentioned now there is this VLAN 704 that I don't think was there before... It would be nice to understand whats going on but honestly I haven't sat down and read the DYNES documentation so it may be something I should already know... Finals' are over now so I'll likely have a little more time now. Regarding the new dual switch configuration. Since the 6248 switch only has 4 ports and two of those are needed to bridge to the 8132 I am limited to how I can configure things. If DYNES software isn't up on the 8132s yet we could instead leave the 6249 in place and instead use two of the ports to bridging, and the remaining two for the uplink and the public facing interface on the FDT server. If DYNES doesn't need access to the private (VLAN 1) on the FDT then this is probably best the easiest thing to do for all of us. Later if it becomes necessary to extend DYNES circuits beyond the one + one on the 6248 we can turn over the 8132 to DYNEs. I don't mind either way. Jorge On 24-Apr-13 05:38 PM, Shawn McKee
wrote:
Hi Jorge, |
- [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Jorge L. Rodriguez, 04/24/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Shawn McKee, 04/24/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Jorge L. Rodriguez, 04/24/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Chris Griffin, 04/24/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Jorge L. Rodriguez, 04/25/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Chris Griffin, 04/24/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Jorge L. Rodriguez, 04/24/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] FIU EndSite and DYNES, Shawn McKee, 04/24/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.