DYNES-Deployments

[Jason Zurawski <>]

Hi Garhan;

At this point I would favor "It'll be done when it's done", but in all 
actuality we should be looking at a 'weeks' time frame.  This has been an 
unexpected and nasty surprise for us given that the DYNES grant is not 
developing software - we had expected to take the products and just plug and 
chug.

I will ask the tech team to get in contact with you this week regarding next 
steps.  

Thanks;

-jason

On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Garhan Attebury 
<>
 wrote:

> Not to pester too much, but can you give any idea of a timeframe for this 
> issue to be resolved? Think it might be weeks? Months? "It'll be done when 
> it's done" is also an appropriate answer I suppose.
> 
> We're just curious on an estimated timeline as it will let us plan our own 
> project timeline better (one of the proposed components requires DYNES 
> interaction between Wisc and UNL).
> 
> 
> Garhan Attebury
> Holland Computing Center
> University of Nebraska-Lincoln
> 402-472-7761
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
> 
>> Hi Garhan;
>> 
>> The issue with UNL (and with about 10 others at this point) is not being 
>> blocked anything with the sites (rest assured that if it was blocked on 
>> you, you would be getting nasty grams from me :)).  Right now we are still 
>> struggling with software: OSCARS v6 and peering with ION which is OSCARS 
>> v5. Once we have this in a working state, additional instructions will be 
>> passed to you regarding the handoff of operation.  
>> 
>> In the case of a site like Wisconsin, they peered to ION using the older 
>> OSCARS software since they were in an earlier group, and didn't see the 
>> same problems.  
>> 
>> We do apologize that things are taking as long as they are.  We hope to 
>> see several sites go active as soon as this peering issue is taken care 
>> of.  
>> 
>> Thanks;
>> 
>> -jason