ddx - Re: [ddx] DKIM and CNames
Subject: DKIM Deployment
List archive
- From: Serge Aumont <>
- To:
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [ddx] DKIM and CNames
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:21:59 +0200
Hi
On 04/23/2010 04:04 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just felt on a problem with CNAMES, not related to DKIM, but
> which can have some implications.
>
> Well, the *default* sendmail configuration has confDONT_EXPAND_CNAMES.
> Brian Costales Bat Book recommends to change the default configuration
> to True, which most people don't, as this isn't the default value.
>
> So, consider a hostname defined as (hopefully, there aren't too many) :
>
> lists-one.domain.com. CNAME lists.domain.com.
> lists.domain.com. A 1.2.3.4
>
> When sendmail receives this, with the default configuration option it
> will replace the contents of headers (To:, CC: and probably others
> too) referencing list-one.domain.com to lists.domain.com.
>
> And this can break DKIM signature.
>
> Did someone other than me already found this ?
It seems to me that the domain part of a valid email must be a CNAME or
a MX, not an alias.
is not a valid email address.
That my understanding of RFC 1912 section 2.4 :
"A CNAME record is not allowed to coexist with any other data. In
other words, if suzy.podunk.xx is an alias for sue.podunk.xx, you
can't also have an MX record for suzy.podunk.edu, or an A record, or
even a TXT record.
So the question of a valid DKIM signature of this invalid email should
not be considered.
Serge Aumont
- DKIM and CNames, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz, 04/23/2010
- Re: [ddx] DKIM and CNames, Serge Aumont, 04/23/2010
- Re: [ddx] DKIM and CNames, Dave CROCKER, 04/23/2010
- Re: [ddx] DKIM and CNames, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz, 04/23/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.