Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ddx - Re: [ddx] dkim inconsistency

Subject: DKIM Deployment

List archive

Re: [ddx] dkim inconsistency


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jim Fenton <>
  • To: Dave CROCKER <>
  • Cc: Jesse Thompson <>,
  • Subject: Re: [ddx] dkim inconsistency
  • Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:44:48 -0700
  • Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3; ; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );

Regardless, the short answer is that we are verifying signatures from
Yahoo and Facebook (actually facebookmail.com) successfully.

-Jim

Dave CROCKER wrote:
> I'm going to suggest that you pursue this on the dkim-testers list:
>
> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/>
>
> I'm pretty sure that's the best choice of DKIM venues for the problem.
>
> d/
>
> Jesse Thompson wrote:
>> So, I've been playing around with the new DKIM verification feature
>> in PureMessage.
>>
>> One thing I notice is that all signatures from Yahoo and Facebook are
>> failing, and mostly succeeding for other domains, including Gmail and
>> Paypal. Not that I care that much about validating email from Yahoo,
>> but I wanted to know if the problem was on my end, or their end.
>> Surely Yahoo is correctly signing their mail!?
>>
>> So, I did some testing with the auto-responders listed in the
>> "Interoperability Testing" section of http://dkimproxy.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> It appears that Yahoo's signatures fail for some of the
>> autoresponders, and succeed for others. Also, it appears the
>> subsequent tests to the same auto-responder yields inverse results
>> (which I can only assume has to do with solar flare activity).
>>
>> So, basically, Yahoo's DKIM signatures are totally inconsistent. Is
>> this just Yahoo (and Facebook)? If DKIM is this unreliable for other
>> senders, I don't know how it can be useful for things like whitelisting.
>>
>> Jesse
>>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page