Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ddx - Re: [ddx] User stories I heard today.

Subject: DKIM Deployment

List archive

Re: [ddx] User stories I heard today.


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Leif Johansson <>
  • To: Jesse Thompson <>
  • Cc: DDX <>
  • Subject: Re: [ddx] User stories I heard today.
  • Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:00:35 +0100

On Wednesday 19 November 2008 21:34:43 Jesse Thompson wrote:
> Leif Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2008 19:50:43 Jesse Thompson wrote:
> >> Indicate to the end-user that the message is DKIM signed, even if the
> >> reputation of the sender isn't verified.
> >
> > So I'm wondering how to express the value to the end-user, i.e what is it
> > the end-user gets out of an indication that the email was signed if the
> > sender reputation isn't known?
>
> Well, it's no different than PGP or S/MIME signing in that regard. It
> just lets the user know that the domain isn't forged. They'd have to
> make their own decision as to whether the domain is trustworthy.
>
> Jesse

How about this:

Email users want a clear indication that the sender domain was not forged in
order to detect phising attempts.

Cheers Leif

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page