Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-users - [comanage-users] verified email in COPerson

Subject: COmanage Users List

List archive

[comanage-users] verified email in COPerson


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Paul Caskey <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [comanage-users] verified email in COPerson
  • Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:16:17 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;internet2.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:0

Well, I am **so** almost there….   J

 

So, the enrollment flow is verifying the email address.  It’s marked as verified in the Org Person record.

 

However, its marked as unverified in the attached CO Person.

 

Is there a way to bring the ‘verified’ property over from the Org Person record?

 

Or, maybe there’s a reason why that’s dispreferred?   J

 

It still gets provisioned to LDAP, so not a huge deal…

 

Thanks!

 

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page