Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

Re: [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Scott Koranda <>
  • To: Arlen Johnson <>
  • Cc: comanage-dev <>
  • Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release
  • Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:22:52 -0500

Hi,

I am also finding that after the pull, when I am authenticated
as a user that is a CO admin but NOT a CMP admin, I cannot see

/registry/co_dashboards/dashboard/co:2

I receive a "Permission Denied" session flash.

I am looking in detail now but I suspect a somewhat large
issue because the values I am seeing returned for

$this->Role->calculateCMRoles()

in isAuthorized() for the CoDashboardsController

are quite wrong.

I have cleared the cache by the way but the problem still
persists.

Thanks,

Scott


> Thanks, Scott - I'm taking a look.
> A
>
> On 7/8/15 8:55 AM, Scott Koranda wrote:
>
> Hi Arlen,
>
> After pulling these changes when I look at
> /registry/co_people/canvas/<id>
> I see errors like
>
> Undefined index: Search.given
>
> A screenshot is attached.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Arlen Johnson
> <>
> wrote:
>
> Ok - I just pushed a fairly large commit - 52 files, almost all in
> View, though I touched the language file as well.
>
> A
>
>
> On 7/7/15 3:55 PM, Arlen Johnson wrote:
>
> Sounds good (-:
> A
>
> On 7/7/15 2:28 PM, Benn Oshrin wrote:
>
> Commit as you're ready. I'll announce a freeze for 0.9.4 at
> some point,
> but I need to finish a couple of tickets first.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Benn-
>
> On 7/7/15 8:58 AM, Arlen Johnson wrote:
>
> Upcoming commits from me will not be "big" changes, but
> will touch 50+
> files.
>
> My most current updates change some behaviors, but
> should
> not change
> screenshots (in any way that would matter).
>
> If 0.9.4 is not yet tagged, I can commit fixes (and
> close
> some tickets) for
> CO-1014 - Incorrect I18n in breadcrumbs (and in side
> menus)
> A number of fixes to improve the existing search
> interfaces
> (for
> co_people, org_identities)
>
> There's potentially more cleanup I can do and commit as
> well. The
> alternative is for me to retag all the 0.9.4 tickets to
> 1.0, wait for
> the 0.9.4 tag to be pushed out, and then start
> committing.
>
> Preference?
>
> Arlen
>
>
> On 7/1/15 12:53 PM, Arlen Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi, Heather, Benn -
>
> I'm in full accord with all - and I'll also hold
> off on
> pushing any
> updates for 0.9.4 (I'm bogged down at the moment
> anyway). So - go for
> the tagging, and I'll try to give 1.0 tickets for
> UI a
> solid look in
> the latter half of this week.  Functional QA in
> particular I'm ready
> to dig into - and there are other items I'll want to
> pursue.
>
> My plan is to devote July and August /primarily/ to
> Comanage
> development (or at least make it the majority of
> what I
> do) to wrap up
> the tickets that remain (and are achievable) in the
> UI.
>
> Arlen
>
>
> On 6/29/15 5:46 PM, Heather Flanagan wrote:
>
> On 6/24/15 12:56 PM, Benn Oshrin wrote:
>
> Given Scott is on vacation, I'll be in
> LA,
> and Heather is probably
> just plain exhausted, let's skip
> Friday's
> call.
>
> It was an ... interesting trip home.
>
>
> Instead, please assemble a list of JIRA
> issues that you think
> should be blockers for 0.9.4 and then
> 1.0.0. My current thought is
> to finish up CO-310 and a few other
> small/
> critical/low hanging
> issues and then tag 0.9.4 probably
> mid-to-late next week. If
> there's anything you want included
> before I
> tag, be sure to include
> it in your list, or flag it as a
> Blocker in
> JIRA.
>
> The theme of 0.9.4 is "it's been almost
> 4
> months, it's time to
> tag".
>
> I expect you all have this part covered, so I'm
> focusing on
> the 1.0.0
> items
>
>
> For 1.0.0, I'd like to keep the scope
> fairly small. My primary task
> will be "installation simplification",
> as
> well as any fixes that
> shake out of 0.9.4 or are sponsored by a
> client. I'm thinking we
> could tag 1.0.0 as early as mid July.
>
> The theme of 1.0.0 is "it's been almost
> 5
> years, it's time to
> tag".
>
> A-yup. Here's what I'd leave in 1.0.0
>
> CO-297 and related tickets (CO-305, CO-489) (the
> Simplify
> Installation
> tickets)
>
> Unless you think the Europeans and Scandinavians will
> need
> it, I would
> push the VOOT ticket out (CO-607)
>
> CO-224 (Review Accessibility, because that makes the US
> gov't happy)
>
> CO-375 (Do not allow extended type to be deleted...)
> seems
> a rather
> important bug to fix (For the most part, I think pushing
> the "don't be
> stupid" bugs (e.g., CO-790) out makes sense, but this
> one
> is rather
> sneaky)
>
> How likely is it that Scott and Jim's grant is going to
> fund the QA
> work? If not likely, then I think that's the last big
> thing
> I'd put in
> 1.0.0 because if we don't, I don't know where else we'll
> get the money
> for it.
>
> I'll push on the documentation component to try and make
> that more 1.0
> suitable. Arlen, how many UI changes are you planning
> for
> 0.9.4?
> Should I wait for it to be tagged and the demo server
> updated before I
> start taking new screenshots?
>
> -Heather
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page