comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Heather Flanagan <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:46:33 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 6/24/15 12:56 PM, Benn Oshrin wrote:
> Given Scott is on vacation, I'll be in LA, and Heather is probably
> just plain exhausted, let's skip Friday's call.
It was an ... interesting trip home.
>
> Instead, please assemble a list of JIRA issues that you think
> should be blockers for 0.9.4 and then 1.0.0. My current thought is
> to finish up CO-310 and a few other small/critical/low hanging
> issues and then tag 0.9.4 probably mid-to-late next week. If
> there's anything you want included before I tag, be sure to include
> it in your list, or flag it as a Blocker in JIRA.
>
> The theme of 0.9.4 is "it's been almost 4 months, it's time to
> tag".
I expect you all have this part covered, so I'm focusing on the 1.0.0
items
>
> For 1.0.0, I'd like to keep the scope fairly small. My primary task
> will be "installation simplification", as well as any fixes that
> shake out of 0.9.4 or are sponsored by a client. I'm thinking we
> could tag 1.0.0 as early as mid July.
>
> The theme of 1.0.0 is "it's been almost 5 years, it's time to
> tag".
A-yup. Here's what I'd leave in 1.0.0
CO-297 and related tickets (CO-305, CO-489) (the Simplify Installation
tickets)
Unless you think the Europeans and Scandinavians will need it, I would
push the VOOT ticket out (CO-607)
CO-224 (Review Accessibility, because that makes the US gov't happy)
CO-375 (Do not allow extended type to be deleted...) seems a rather
important bug to fix (For the most part, I think pushing the "don't be
stupid" bugs (e.g., CO-790) out makes sense, but this one is rather
sneaky)
How likely is it that Scott and Jim's grant is going to fund the QA
work? If not likely, then I think that's the last big thing I'd put in
1.0.0 because if we don't, I don't know where else we'll get the money
for it.
I'll push on the documentation component to try and make that more 1.0
suitable. Arlen, how many UI changes are you planning for 0.9.4?
Should I wait for it to be tagged and the demo server updated before I
start taking new screenshots?
- -Heather
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVkby5AAoJEBTitMubYA+RPuUIAK4gh8m03/7RkZJ340I5YFS0
hZIZCAqJ25A3xGzV1WCkrmbSBHEcnqLokvSpKzHjaOoI7p3J9CwJj83C98Ec8L6E
07P8AzydcwFeQbNgRWa6ALjAMC9HCPInjZok486v4T8Aj9YvYZgXpSBtgUL1ynTR
QE/HcVxa/vNv38QP/ppd4M9RNGHnbI/BIKo64aUEWZ/uJFjgV8sdiBu7v78pjwNz
wG0VTDIjvzwZERMIp6zTPLpnnyYFe7G1FAtNmVUFMBtx6mW5kt/jVPGVE9GTjZf/
O6L2BRCdrFve2WiEWcyw1C44gZKUFaCBOZYzW8BYtbhYirIL+6Gb1MgE35HSfBM=
=V/o1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release, Benn Oshrin, 06/24/2015
- Re: [comanage-dev] No call Friday ; 1.0.0 Release, Heather Flanagan, 06/29/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.