Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] Fwd: RE: COmanage demo?

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

[comanage-dev] Fwd: RE: COmanage demo?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Heather Flanagan <>
  • To: comanage-dev <>
  • Subject: [comanage-dev] Fwd: RE: COmanage demo?
  • Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:13:36 -0800
  • Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu; dkim=pass (signature verified)

FYI - we will have a side meeting at some point in time during the week
with Paul Caskey.

-Heather


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: COmanage demo?
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:08:42 +0000
From: Caskey, Paul
<>
To: 'Heather Flanagan'
<>

Hi Heather!

Yes, to both questions (will be there and would love to talk).

Things have been evolving slowly here, but they are evolving...

TTYL


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heather Flanagan
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:58 AM
> To: Caskey, Paul
> Subject: Re: COmanage demo?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> It looks like the I2 meeting is going to be significantly different than in
> the
> past, with the focus entirely off middleware and entirely on
> Net+. Still, the COmanage team will be there! Are you going to attend
> the I2 meeting this April, and if so, would you like to catch up on if/how
> COmanage might help you down in Texas?
>
> -Heather Flanagan,
> COmanage Program Coordinator
>
>
> On 12/3/12 5:45 PM, Caskey, Paul wrote:
> > Hi Heather-
> >
> > I have not had a chance for the demo. Yet.
> >
> > We decided to do something different for "phase 1" because of tight time
> constraints (December).
> >
> > But, last week, that got postponed until May, so we now have some
> breathing room.
> >
> > We are mired by the fact that in the near-term, we are bound to an
> > existing
> accounting system at our HPC site and they insist on everyone having one of
> their local accounts. So, a new identity registry, group mgmt. system, and
> way of onboarding users is not something they want to hear right now, but
> we are focused on that being the long-term goal. Short-term, they just
> agreed to work towards binding external/federated IDs to their local
> accounts, so we're making progress, but not there yet.
> >
> > So, a demo is still important to me, but the timing is now uncertain. I
> > want
> to find a time where me (or one of you all, perhaps) can do a brief demo
> for
> some of our researchers. We recently had a call with them (an advisory
> group for so-called "ease of use"), but we were discussing other things (app
> capabilities, invitation, social IDs, etc). The next call might be a good
> time, but
> I don't think we have scheduled it yet.
> >
> > So, I'll let you know how it's going and if we can get a demo setup,
> > but nothing much has happened yet - just a little derailment. ;)
> >
> > TTYL
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Heather Flanagan
> >> [mailto:]
> >> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 7:36 PM
> >> To: Caskey, Paul
> >> Subject: COmanage demo?
> >>
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> did you ever have a chance to do that COmanage demo you were talking
> >> about at the I2 meeting in October? How is that project going for you?
> >>
> >> -Heather Flanagan
> >> COmanage Project Coordinator





  • [comanage-dev] Fwd: RE: COmanage demo?, Heather Flanagan, 02/25/2013

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page