comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Questions/concerns expressed by auth team
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: Benn Oshrin <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Questions/concerns expressed by auth team
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:59:24 -0600
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Benn Oshrin
<>
wrote:
> On 11/30/12 3:33 PM, Heather Flanagan wrote:
>
>> 1 - follow up on the potential need to have someone not in a CO be
>> authorized to add people to the CO (and yet, not be CMP admin)
>
>
> No ticket for this until we understand it better.
Agreed.
I also think we need a firm CO/COU model before we can address it in detail.
Thanks,
Scott
>
>> 2 - concern about who can handle approvals and whether we have the right
>> authorization group process associated with the enrollment flow (maybe
>> create an authZ group per enrollment flow?)
>
>
> CO-511
>
>> 3 - Can you clone an enrollment flow? (do we have a ticket for this?)
>
>
> We have CO-273 and CO-453, which are in the same ballpark. I've created
> CO-510.
>
>> 4 - specify default value for historical records when new attribute
>> defined
>
>
> CO-508.
>
>> 5 - An admin script to recursively populate id's?
>
>
> CO-509. This would be a button, not a script.
>
>> 6 - What if someone is an active member of two closely related CO?
>> (similar to account linking problem)
>
>
> Not sure if there is a specific follow up from this one.
>
> Also:
>
> CO-506: Better handling of identifier assignment especially if only one
> name.
>
> CO-512: Reconcile against pending records.
>
> -Benn-
- Re: [comanage-dev] Questions/concerns expressed by auth team, Benn Oshrin, 12/03/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] Questions/concerns expressed by auth team, Scott Koranda, 12/03/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.