comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Naming, again
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: Benn Oshrin <>
- Cc: comanage-dev <>
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Naming, again
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:21:59 -0500
Hi,
> I'm thinking that for VAMP and the FMM we should start using the
> name "CORE" to describe COmanage REgistry. (We briefly thought about
> this a year or so ago.)
>
> "Registry" is too generic, "COmanage Registry" too long to say, and
> "CORE" conveys where this thing sits in your infrastructure.
>
> Comments?
Meh.
I don't think COmanage Registry is too long to say and I like
using the brand of COmanage.
Thanks,
Scott
- [comanage-dev] Naming, again, Benn Oshrin, 07/13/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] Naming, again, Scott Koranda, 07/13/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.