comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Benn Oshrin <>
- To: Scott Koranda <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500
On 2/23/12 10:32 PM, Scott Koranda wrote:
Nit: Can you give this page a more specific name?What do you suggest?
Something like "LIGO Reconciliation Requirements". (We can split out more general stuff later.)
So, my original question was, is this going in the right
direction to address CO-186 and CO-179?
I am asking as much about the process and style as I am the
content...
Well, so effectively we're doing something like
- Gather requirements
- Identify technical changes required
- Specify technical changes (eg: API calls, etc)
What you're doing now is mostly the first step.
-Benn-
- [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Scott Koranda, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Benn Oshrin, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Scott Koranda, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Benn Oshrin, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Scott Koranda, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Benn Oshrin, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Scott Koranda, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Benn Oshrin, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Scott Koranda, 02/23/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] reconciliation design work, Benn Oshrin, 02/23/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.