comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Re: (CO-89) Add sponsor to data model
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Marie Huynh <>
- To: Benn Oshrin <>
- Cc: comanage-dev <>
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Re: (CO-89) Add sponsor to data model
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:21:26 -0700
> There may be two use cases here: sponsor to get enrolled and sponsor to stay
> enrolled. Regardless of LIGO requirements, COmanage should probably support
> both.
Would that sponsor to stay enrolled be the same one that would keep
you enrolled by default? If not, how long before someone gets booted
for not having a valid sponsor to stay in?
>>> How many levels of sponsorship do we need? I added a sponsor for
>>> membership into a group in cm_co_group_members here:
>>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/cm_co_group_members
Reverted so I don't forget to do it later.
>>>
>>> Is that level sufficient or will there ever be a need for sponsors
>>> into the CO or CMP level?
>
> I think sponsor gets attached to co_person_role. Alternately, if there are
> multiple sponsors per person (which I hope there aren't), we need a
> co_sponsors table (but let's try not to go this route).
Since people can join more than one COU, we will need sponsors for
each. If each row of co_person_role corresponds to one COU and one
person, we can still add the sponsor to that and not need a
co_sponsors table.
Scott, do we need more than one sponsor?
Marie
>
> I hadn't thought about sponsors as part of group memberships... I wonder if
> CORE (COmanage REgistry) should do this or if we should rely on Grouper (or
> the GMS) to worry about it. The CORE design for groups was always intended
> to be pretty minimal. (Can Grouper track sponsors for group memberships? Is
> there even a LIGO requirement around this?)
>
> -Benn-
>
- [comanage-dev] Re: (CO-89) Add sponsor to data model, Benn Oshrin, 10/28/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Re: (CO-89) Add sponsor to data model, Marie Huynh, 10/28/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.