comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: Benn Oshrin <>
- Cc: comanage-dev <>
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:27:26 -0500
> On 10/9/11 7:58 PM, Scott Koranda wrote:
>
> >Fortunately it is a wiki, so you can wordsmith at that level
> >of detail yourself. ;-)
>
> Sure, but the point being that it's as important for the
> documentation to have a consistent style as for the code (probably
> more important).
>
Agreed.
I propose, however, that we put off a discussion about
documentation style until the next time we have to write a
large chunk of it.
I prefer right now to focus on getting the code written for
the upcoming milestones.
Cheers,
Scott
- [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Benn Oshrin, 10/09/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Scott Koranda, 10/09/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Benn Oshrin, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Scott Koranda, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Benn Oshrin, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Scott Koranda, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Benn Oshrin, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Scott Koranda, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Benn Oshrin, 10/10/2011
- Re: [comanage-dev] Documentation Style, Scott Koranda, 10/09/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.