Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] Draft Minutes: COmanage-dev call 15-April-2011

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

[comanage-dev] Draft Minutes: COmanage-dev call 15-April-2011


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Emily Eisbruch <>
  • To: CoMaNaGe-DeV <>
  • Subject: [comanage-dev] Draft Minutes: COmanage-dev call 15-April-2011
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:57:35 -0400

Attending

Heather Flanagan, Internet2 (chair) 
Ken Klingenstein, Internet2 
Steven Carmody, Brown  
Keith Hazelton, U-W, Madison 
RL “Bob” Morgan, U-Washington 
Benn Oshrin, Internet2 
Steve Olshansky, Internet2 
Emily Eisbruch, Internet2 (scribe) 

Carry Over Action Items

[AI] (Heather) will work on arranging a meeting with NSF people during SMM  - ad hoc

[AI] (Steven) will extend his inquiry on iPlant and Shibboleth to Nirav 

[AI] (Keith) will make sure that the COmanage glossary covers roles and groups accurately. https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/Glossary

[AI] (Ken) will provide a link to the French listing regarding applications and sets/bundles of attributes.  

[AI] (Ken) will contact David Groep about VOMS GUMS.

[AI] (Steven) will develop a one-page write-up on attribute aggregation.  

Discussion

I2SMM - Desired Outcomes

Agenda for the COmanage WG at 2011 SMM 

          ** roadmap review
          ** discussion of group management and why the group API instead of just incorporating Grouper
          ** how VO might handle namespace issues
          ** who is working on domesticating applications? What apps?
          ** the latest thoughts on Intake and Enrollment Process

Comments:
  • Keith: VO status is of interest
  • Benn: At some point during the SMM, it will be important to review the plan for COmanage intake and enrollment https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/8YWAAQ
  • Not sure if the COmanage WG attendees want a simple update or are ready to engage
  • Heather: Are we ready to have people start to deploy?
  • Benn: not exactly ready for deployment....people can test the code and provide comments
  • We don’t want to present a demo at the WG.  Recently, demos are taking 45 minutes on the phone
  • Heather suggests a sign-up sheet for interested folks to schedule a demo 1-2 weeks post SMM
  • Benn: for high impact people, we could set up a time sometime during SMM and do a demo 

  • Keith is interested in the Group Management bullet on the agenda
  • Is COmanage already pointing to the FIFER API ? 
  • Benn: right now a quick and dirty method is being used.
  • Chris and Benn hope to meet to talk about FIFER during the SMM, 
  • They are getting close to a proof of concept with a Grouper back end and a COmanage front end

COmanage Lists

  • Q: Where do we direct people who are interested in COmanage, but do not belong on the COmanage-dev list? 
  • Which list should they be added to?
  • Heather noted that COmanage lists are covered on the wiki at: https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/Email+Lists
  • Heather suggested that interested people should use the COmanage users list
  • Benn stated that we are at too early a stage for a "users" list
  • Don't want to have too many lists
  • Suggestion to use the COmanage Community list. 
  • Heather will put this in the slides

Q: Where to direct people who might get involved?

A: Need the right kind of alignment, ad hoc discussions can determine if community members can be helpful to COmanage development

Steven: Many interested folks aren't ready to contribute to the COmanage development, they would like to take what is available and use it for their purposes

Q: Is there code ready to be used right now?

A: Yes, but the intake / enrollment/ onboarding code will be greatly enhanced / overhauled in the next few weeks. 

More SMM Planning

  • RL "Bob" stated he is putting together his "Identity: Now a Major Motion Picture Session"  talk
  • There will be a few lines about COmanage if not a whole slide
  • RL "Bob" plans to convey that we are inclined to work more specifically to meet the needs of some identified VOs as opposed to providing a generic "COmanage-in-a-box" type system
  • Benn agreed with that characterization, adding that we are looking a general space, looking at well defined problems and coming up with solutions that could be adapted to various situations

Q:  Is there going to be a BoF around provisioning?  (Niels had suggested that and many people are interested)

A: Nothing yet been formalized. Could be ad hoc, to be decided on Monday, April 18

Collaboration - File Sharing
     
  • Heather is working on a document on an educational File Sharing for CIOs
  • Influenced by conversation at CSG
  • Please review this file sharing document at  :  https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/File+Sharing+for+VO
  • Ken noted that file sharing fits in with thcloud service that Internet2 is planning to offer.
  • Priorities for the cloud service are computation plus associated storage service
  • Many interesting use cases for file sharing are inter-institutional, involving interfederation, entitlements
  • Khalil Yazdi, Internet2 contractor, is involved in these discussions, figuring out requirements
  • Leif has been doing interesting work in the file sharing area; the Lobber project, using the BitTorrent approach https://wiki.surfnetlabs.nl/display/domestication/Lobber



  • Heather stated that the COmanage glossary has been changed and updated recently.
  • Keith noted that the MACE-paccman group has on objective to work on a unified MACE-wide aligned glossary.
  • This will be a good topic for discussion at the SMM.
  • Heather will plan to attend the paccman WG session for discussion

VIVO

  • At the recent CNI conference, Heather had discussions with VIVO people.  
  • The VIVO people brought up use cases of researchers needing access to resources/services based on info in their profile
  • Example: a researcher may have access to a wiki depending on which grants they have, and the grants are captured in the VIVO profile.
  • This need to get data from the VIVO profile enriches the access control space
  • NIH is encouraging of VIVO 


NSTIC

  • Ken noted that  Peter Alterman is moving from NIH to NIST and will be involved with NSTIC.
  • NSTIC is in the news today (15-April-2011)
 

Moonshot

  • RL "Bob" raised general questions re applicability of Moonshot 
  • MyProxy client seems to be incorporating Moonshot ability http://nationalgridservice.blogspot.com/2011/04/shooting-for-moon.html
  • Seems daunting to deploy Moonshot in the US. 
  • What is the status of RADIUS in the US? 
  • How does Moonshot fit into COmanage?
  • Perhaps we should promote a SAML-based alternative.
  • Ken: in the SDCI grant proposal we committed to federated and domesticated version of SSH
  • Ken has an upcoming phone call this afternoon that may tell more about future status of RADIUS in the US


2011 Spring Member Meeting in Arlington, VA

__________________

COmanage Working Group at SMM: 
Monday, April 18, 2011, 9:15 AM - 10:15 AM
Location: Salon A

__________________

ALSO AT SMM:

International Collaboration Platforms – SURFconext, COIP, COmanage
Monday, April 18, 2011, 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Location: Salon D/E

---------------

Supporting Research Communities: Collaborations in Action
Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 1:15 PM - 2:30 PM
Location: Salon I/II/III


---------------






Emily Eisbruch, Technology Transfer Analyst
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4996 | mobile +1-734-730-5749

Visit our website: www.internet2.edu
Follow us on Twitter: 
www.twitter.com/internet2
Become a Fan on Facebook: 
www.internet2.edu/facebook

 













  • [comanage-dev] Draft Minutes: COmanage-dev call 15-April-2011, Emily Eisbruch, 04/15/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page